[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Kernel 2.0.33 with ibmtr.multiple.adapter.patch.v2.0.33 and ipxrouting

To: linux-tr@emissary.aus-etc.com
Subject: Re: Kernel 2.0.33 with ibmtr.multiple.adapter.patch.v2.0.33 and ipxrouting
From: Paul Norton <pnorton@ccnvhi.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1998 09:14:37 -0700
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980416110226.1346D-100000@moocow>
References: <199804161502.IAA04908@grumpy.ccnvhi.com><Pine.LNX.3.96.980416110226.1346D-100000@moocow>
Reply-to: linux-tr@emissary.aus-etc.com
Sender: owner-linux-tr@emissary.aus-etc.com

Yah, could be. I guess I should start boning up on my IPX/SPX. Any
recommendations for reading material? And besides Novell, what do I
need to test it?

Mike Eckhoff writes:
 > I noticed that 2.1.96 also finaly implemented SPX as well.  Just to save
 > you some work, it may be in your best intrest to start trying to figure
 > out the multiple adapter stuff from there since most likely a few things
 > were changed in the IPX/SPX area.
 > 
 > Ya think? :)
 > 
 > Take care
 > 
 > Mike
 >

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Kernel 2.0.33 with ibmtr.multiple.adapter.patch.v2.0.33 and ipx routing
  - From: Mike Eckhoff <bert@willy.wsc.edu>

References:
- Kernel 2.0.33 with ibmtr.multiple.adapter.patch.v2.0.33 and ipx routing
  - From: Paul Norton <pnorton@ccnvhi.com>
- Re: Kernel 2.0.33 with ibmtr.multiple.adapter.patch.v2.0.33 and ipx routing
  - From: Mike Eckhoff <bert@willy.wsc.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: Kernel 2.0.33 with ibmtr.multiple.adapter.patch.v2.0.33 and ipx routing
Next by Date: Re: Kernel 2.0.33 with ibmtr.multiple.adapter.patch.v2.0.33 and ipx routing
Previous by thread: Re: Kernel 2.0.33 with ibmtr.multiple.adapter.patch.v2.0.33 and ipx routing
Next by thread: Re: Kernel 2.0.33 with ibmtr.multiple.adapter.patch.v2.0.33 and ipx routing
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread